[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160525032148.GD14480@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 04:21:49 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 4.6.0-git - bisected to commit dd254f5a382c
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:06:03PM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>
> > On May 24, 2016, at 8:28 PM, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > The next obvious question is which binary it is and what's the return
> > address to userland; make that
> > if (!size)
> > printk(KERN_ERR "crap in %s[%x]",
> > current->comm,
> > current_pt_regs()->rip);
> > (in the same place)
>
> This is an ARM board, no rip. Quick log without, can re-run again later tonight or maybe tomorrow:
probably ->ARM_pc, then...
> [ 8.008054] crap in udevd
Indeed. Which version of that Fine Piece Of Software is it? Again, the
kernel-side bug is real and needs fixing, but "udev does something bogus"
is not surprising in the slightest...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists