lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57451B9C.7070705@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 11:27:24 +0800
From:	Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>
To:	Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
CC:	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ni Wade <wni@...dia.com>,
	Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@...el.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	dianders@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	edubezval@...il.com, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, smbarber@...gle.com,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, cf@...k-chips.com,
	briannorris@...gle.com, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Andy Champ <andycham@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] thermal: Add support for hardware-tracked trip
 points

Hi Javi,

Thanks your reviewing.

On 2016年05月24日 20:57, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:33:29PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>>
>> This adds support for hardware-tracked trip points to the device tree
>> thermal sensor framework.
>>
>> The framework supports an arbitrary number of trip points. Whenever
>> the current temperature is updated, the trip points immediately
>> below and above the current temperature are found. A .set_trips
>> callback is then called with the temperatures. If there is no trip
>> point above or below the current temperature, the passed trip
>> temperature will be -INT_MAX or INT_MAX respectively. In this callback,
>> the driver should program the hardware such that it is notified
>> when either of these trip points are triggered. When a trip point
>> is triggered, the driver should call `thermal_zone_device_update'
>> for the respective thermal zone. This will cause the trip points
>> to be updated again.
>>
>> If .set_trips is not implemented, the framework behaves as before.
>>
>> This patch is based on an earlier version from Mikko Perttunen
>> <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
>> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - update the sysfs-api.txt for set_trips
>>
>>   Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt |  7 +++++
>>   drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c      | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/thermal.h             |  3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
<cut..>
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Set a temperature window. When this window is left the driver
>> +	 * must inform the thermal core via thermal_zone_device_update.
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = tz->ops->set_trips(tz, low, high);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_err(&tz->device, "Failed to set trips: %d\n", ret);
> This function can be called at the same time from multiple places so
> it should be reentrant.  I think you should call mutex_lock(tz->lock)
> before "if (tz->prev_low_trip == low && ..." and unlock it here.

Sound reasonable, fixes it in next version.

>> +}
>> +
>>   static void update_temperature(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>>   {
>>   	int temp, ret;
>> @@ -569,6 +614,8 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>>   
>>   	update_temperature(tz);
>>   
>> +	thermal_zone_set_trips(tz);
>> +
>>   	for (count = 0; count < tz->trips; count++)
>>   		handle_thermal_trip(tz, count);
>>   }
>> @@ -754,6 +801,9 @@ trip_point_hyst_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   	 */
>>   	ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip, temperature);
>>   
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		thermal_zone_set_trips(tz);
>> +
> You should add a similar call to thermal_zone_set_trips() in trip_point_temp_store()

No, this patch has been done.

if you see the linux next kernel.
72f3ada UPSTREAM: thermal: trip_point_temp_store() calls 
thermal_zone_device_update()

--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
@@ -733,8 +733,12 @@ trip_point_temp_store(struct device *dev, struct 
device_attribute *attr,
return -EINVAL;

ret = tz->ops->set_trip_temp(tz, trip, temperature);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;

- return ret ? ret : count;
+ thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
+
+ return count;
}

So the "thermal_zone_set_trips(tz)" have been set in 
thermal_zone_device_update.

>>   	return ret ? ret : count;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -1843,6 +1893,8 @@ struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_device_register(const char *type,
>>   	tz->trips = trips;
>>   	tz->passive_delay = passive_delay;
>>   	tz->polling_delay = polling_delay;
>> +	tz->prev_low_trip = INT_MAX;
>> +	tz->prev_high_trip = -INT_MAX;
>>   	/* A new thermal zone needs to be updated anyway. */
>>   	atomic_set(&tz->need_update, 1);
>>   
>> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> index e45abe7..e258359 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device_ops {
>>   	int (*unbind) (struct thermal_zone_device *,
>>   		       struct thermal_cooling_device *);
>>   	int (*get_temp) (struct thermal_zone_device *, int *);
>> +	int (*set_trips) (struct thermal_zone_device *, int, int);
>>   	int (*get_mode) (struct thermal_zone_device *,
>>   			 enum thermal_device_mode *);
>>   	int (*set_mode) (struct thermal_zone_device *,
>> @@ -199,6 +200,8 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
>>   	int last_temperature;
>>   	int emul_temperature;
>>   	int passive;
>> +	int prev_low_trip;
>> +	int prev_high_trip;
> Please document these fields in the kerneldoc comment before struct
> thermal_zone_device.

Okay, done.

Thanks!

-
Caesar
>>   	unsigned int forced_passive;
>>   	atomic_t need_update;
>>   	struct thermal_zone_device_ops *ops;
> Cheers,
> Javi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ