linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 39/40] net: bridge: fix old ioctl unlocked net device walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1464197443-20056-40-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 10:30:42 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 39/40] net: bridge: fix old ioctl unlocked net device walk

3.19.8-ckt22 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>

[ Upstream commit 31ca0458a61a502adb7ed192bf9716c6d05791a5 ]

get_bridge_ifindices() is used from the old "deviceless" bridge ioctl
calls which aren't called with rtnl held. The comment above says that it is
called with rtnl but that is not really the case.
Here's a sample output from a test ASSERT_RTNL() which I put in
get_bridge_ifindices and executed "brctl show":
[  957.422726] RTNL: assertion failed at net/bridge//br_ioctl.c (30)
[  957.422925] CPU: 0 PID: 1862 Comm: brctl Tainted: G        W  O
4.6.0-rc4+ #157
[  957.423009] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS 1.8.1-20150318_183358- 04/01/2014
[  957.423009]  0000000000000000 ffff880058adfdf0 ffffffff8138dec5
0000000000000400
[  957.423009]  ffffffff81ce8380 ffff880058adfe58 ffffffffa05ead32
0000000000000001
[  957.423009]  00007ffec1a444b0 0000000000000400 ffff880053c19130
0000000000008940
[  957.423009] Call Trace:
[  957.423009]  [<ffffffff8138dec5>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
[  957.423009]  [<ffffffffa05ead32>]
br_ioctl_deviceless_stub+0x212/0x2e0 [bridge]
[  957.423009]  [<ffffffff81515beb>] sock_ioctl+0x22b/0x290
[  957.423009]  [<ffffffff8126ba75>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x95/0x700
[  957.423009]  [<ffffffff8126c159>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
[  957.423009]  [<ffffffff8163a4c0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1

Since it only reads bridge ifindices, we can use rcu to safely walk the net
device list. Also remove the wrong rtnl comment above.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_ioctl.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
index 8d423bc..f876f70 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_ioctl.c
@@ -21,18 +21,19 @@
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include "br_private.h"
 
-/* called with RTNL */
 static int get_bridge_ifindices(struct net *net, int *indices, int num)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	int i = 0;
 
-	for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) {
 		if (i >= num)
 			break;
 		if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE)
 			indices[i++] = dev->ifindex;
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return i;
 }
-- 
2.7.4