[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160525203731.GJ3354@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 16:37:31 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, cl@...ux.com,
mika.j.penttila@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, hpa@...or.com,
yasu.isimatu@...il.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
gongzhaogang@...pur.com, len.brown@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, chen.tang@...ystack.cn, rafael@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Make cpuid <-> nodeid mapping persistent
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:02:14PM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
> We tried to do that. You can see our patch at
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2116748
>
> But maintainer thought, we should establish persistent cpuid<->nodeid
> relationship,
> there is no need to change the map.
>
> Cc TJ,
> Could we return to workqueue to fix this?
Workqueue is just one of symptoms. We have the same problem for
memory allocation paths. It's either keeping cpu <-> node mapping
persistent or hunting down every case which may be affected and build
likely costly synchronization construct around it. It's not like we
have a lot of archs which support CPU hotplug and NUMA.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists