[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYdo5XsJvb9GTYph7P=u31treiDX6HZGbG_AGzW5hp1HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:08:42 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Suppress unbinding to prevent
theoretical attacks
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Although unbinding a pinctrl driver requires root privileges but it
> still might be used theoretically in certain attacks (by triggering NULL
> pointer exception or memory corruption).
Patch applied with Javier's review tag.
I suspect this kind of patch should be done to a few
GPIO controller :/
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists