[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYDEN9x8Cyx1bWeZ1Lv39NPsn_Jcr+B4q1NV=KLr3fmBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:33:01 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/54] MAINTAINERS: Add file patterns for pinctrl device
tree bindings
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Submitters of device tree binding documentation may forget to CC
> the subsystem maintainer if this is missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> Please apply this patch directly if you want to be involved in device
> tree binding documentation for your subsystem.
Patch applied for fixes.
Want and want ... the alternative of not being involved is scarier.
Nowadays Linux subsystem maintainers are involved
in both DT and ACPI standardization not by choice but by
necessity.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists