| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1464280503.16344.40.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:35:03 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@...il.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64/numa: fix type info
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:22 -0700, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> wrote:
> > numa_init(of_numa_init) may returned error because of numa configuration
> > error. So "No NUMA configuration found" is inaccurate. In fact, specific
> > configuration error information can be immediately printed by the
> > testing branch. So "No NUMA..." only needs to be printed when numa_off.
[]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
[]
> > @@ -362,7 +362,8 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> > int ret;
> > struct memblock_region *mblk;
> >
> > - pr_info("%s\n", "No NUMA configuration found");
> > + if (numa_off)
> IIRC, it should be
> if (!numa_off)
> we want to print this message when we failed to find proper numa configuration.
> when numa_off is set, we will not look for any numa configuration.
>
> >
> > + pr_info("%s\n", "No NUMA configuration found");
trivia:
Using printk("%s\n", "string") just makes the object code larger
for no particular benefit.
pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n");
would be smaller, faster and more intelligible for humans too.
Maybe something like this:
---
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index 98dc104..2042452 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "NUMA: " fmt
+
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
if (!opt)
return -EINVAL;
if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) {
- pr_info("%s\n", "NUMA turned off");
+ pr_info("NUMA turned off\n");
numa_off = 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE);
/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */
- pr_debug("NUMA: Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
+ pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids);
}
/*
@@ -142,14 +144,14 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
ret = memblock_set_node(start, size, &memblock.memory, nid);
if (ret < 0) {
- pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
- start, (start + size - 1), nid);
+ pr_err("memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
+ start, (start + size - 1), nid);
return ret;
}
node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
- pr_info("NUMA: Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
- start, (start + size - 1), nid);
+ pr_info("Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n",
+ start, (start + size - 1), nid);
return ret;
}
@@ -163,19 +165,18 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
void *nd;
int tnid;
- pr_info("NUMA: Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
- nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
- (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
+ pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+ nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
nd_pa = memblock_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
nd = __va(nd_pa);
/* report and initialize */
- pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+ pr_info("NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1);
tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
if (tnid != nid)
- pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
+ pr_info("NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid);
node_data[nid] = nd;
memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t));
@@ -232,8 +233,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
numa_distance[i * numa_distance_cnt + j] = i == j ?
LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
- pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n",
- numa_distance_cnt);
+ pr_debug("Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", numa_distance_cnt);
return 0;
}
@@ -254,20 +254,20 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
{
if (!numa_distance) {
- pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
+ pr_warn_once("Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
return;
}
if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt ||
from < 0 || to < 0) {
- pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
- from, to, distance);
+ pr_warn_once("Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
+ from, to, distance);
return;
}
if ((u8)distance != distance ||
(from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
- pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
+ pr_warn_once("Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
from, to, distance);
return;
}
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
/* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */
for_each_memblock(memory, mblk)
if (mblk->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk->nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
- pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+ pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
mblk->nid, mblk->base,
mblk->base + mblk->size - 1);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -362,9 +362,8 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
int ret;
struct memblock_region *mblk;
- pr_info("%s\n", "No NUMA configuration found");
- pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
- 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
+ pr_info("No NUMA configuration found - faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
+ 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->size);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists