[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160526165423.GN3206@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:54:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jeremy@...p.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, akataria@...are.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] powerpc use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock
implemention
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:18:03PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> I do several tests on pseries IBM,8408-E8E with 32cpus, 64GB memory.
> benchmark test results are below.
> _____test________________spinlcok______________pv-qspinlcok_____
> | compiling takes| 22m | 22m |
How can a kernel build take 22 minutes with 32 CPUs? That's far too
long. My 40 CPU IVB-EP takes all of 50 seconds to build an
x86_64-defconfig from scratch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists