linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] zram: drop zcomp param from compress/decompress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 May 2016 16:31:02 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] zram: drop zcomp param from compress/decompress

On (05/27/16 13:22), Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:30:02PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > We don't need to supply a zcomp pointer to compress/decompress
> > functions, drop it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> 
> Could you fold this patch into previous one?
> 

yes, I thought about it. decided to keep it separated to ease
the review.

	-ss