[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADKHWac_0TO97JE8ZO43n+fSDWFJnB=QXJxnkpbYYeKausDHmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:58:49 +0800
From: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@...aro.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/15] arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages.
On 25 May 2016 at 06:35, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com> wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>
> As noted by Dennis Chen, we don't want to print "No NUMA configuration
> found" if NUMA was forced off from the command line.
>
> Change the type of numa_off to bool, and clean up printing code.
> Print "NUMA disabled" if forced off on command line and "No NUMA
> configuration found" if there was no firmware NUMA information.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index 6cb03f9..1def1de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
>
> static int numa_distance_cnt;
> static u8 *numa_distance;
> -static int numa_off;
> +static bool numa_off;
>
> static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
> {
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) {
> pr_info("%s\n", "NUMA turned off");
> - numa_off = 1;
> + numa_off = true;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -362,7 +362,10 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> int ret;
> struct memblock_region *mblk;
>
> - pr_info("%s\n", "No NUMA configuration found");
> + if (numa_off)
> + pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
> + else
> + pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n");
> pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
> 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
>
> @@ -375,7 +378,7 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - numa_off = 1;
> + numa_off = true;
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@....com>
--
Regards,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists