linux-kernel - RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B81F104AC@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2016 01:30:58 +0000
From:	"Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Avargil, Raanan" <raanan.avargil@...el.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces
 functional after rxvlan off

> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@...ts.osuosl.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeff Kirsher
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 2:40 PM
> To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> Avargil, Raanan <raanan.avargil@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces
> functional after rxvlan off
> 
> On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 15:03 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface
> > is
> > set up on top of it:
> >
> > $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99
> > $ ip link set ens1f0 up
> > $ ip link set ens1f0.99 up
> > $ ip addr add 192.168.99.92 dev ens1f0.99
> >
> > At this point, I can ping another host on vlan 99, ip 192.168.99.91.
> > However, if I do the following:
> >
> > $ ethtool -K ens1f0 rxvlan off
> >
> > Then no traffic passes on ens1f0.99. It comes back if I toggle rxvlan on
> > again. I'm not sure if this is actually intended behavior, or if there's
> > a
> > lack of software vlan stripping fallback, or what, but things continue to
> > work if I simply don't call e1000e_vlan_strip_disable() if there are
> > active vlans (plagiarizing a function from the e1000 driver here) on the
> > interface.
> >
> > Also slipped a related-ish fix to the kerneldoc text for
> > e1000e_vlan_strip_disable here...
> >
> > CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > CC: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> > CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Raanan, please review this patch.  Even though it is an RFC I will be
> adding it to my queue for testing.
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/623238/

Yup, without this patch disabling rxvlan offload does indeed break vlan connectivity and with the patch I can disable and re-enable rxvlan offloads as much as I care to.  It also makes it through my regression tests without problems.

Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>

This is from functional - does it work - testing perspective so review is probably still in order.