linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] perf callchain: Add support for cross-platform unwind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160527084448.GB23580@krava>
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2016 10:44:48 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Hekuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
	jpoimboe@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	tumanova@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
	penberg@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] perf callchain: Add support for cross-platform
 unwind

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:02:59PM +0800, Hekuang wrote:

SNIP

> > > The only concern is that, if later we support more platforms,
> > > there will be too much files named as 'tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind*.c'
> > > Is it acceptable or not?
> > > 
> > > And I thought all files belongs to specific archs should
> > > go to folder under 'tools/perf/arch/xxx', is that right?
> > hum, I wouldn't worry about that.. but you're right,
> > let's put them under arch
> 
> But only 'tools/perf/arch/$(host platform)' will be built, in our case,
> we should built the unwind-libunwind-$(arch) as long as we have
> the remote libunwind libraries. So, I think there's a conflict in the
> existing build script and not easy to 'put them under arch'. That's why
> I choose a complex way in my previous patch.

we dive into arch dirs via:

arch/Build:
  libperf-y += $(ARCH)/

that's not changed AFAICS..

jirka