lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2016 14:46:58 +0100
From:	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: stm32: fix maybe uninitialized variable warning

On 26/05/16 10:34, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch fixes the following warning:
> drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c: In function 'stm32_rng_read':
> drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c:82:19: warning: 'sr' may be used
>                                         uninitialized in this function
>
> Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>


> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> index 92a810648bd0..63d84e6f1891 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> @@ -69,8 +69,12 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait)
>  		}
>
>  		/* If error detected or data not ready... */
> -		if (sr != RNG_SR_DRDY)
> +		if (sr != RNG_SR_DRDY) {
> +			if (WARN_ONCE(sr & (RNG_SR_SEIS | RNG_SR_CEIS),
> +					"bad RNG status - %x\n", sr))
> +				writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + RNG_SR);
>  			break;
> +		}
>
>  		*(u32 *)data = readl_relaxed(priv->base + RNG_DR);
>
> @@ -79,10 +83,6 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait)
>  		max -= sizeof(u32);
>  	}
>
> -	if (WARN_ONCE(sr & (RNG_SR_SEIS | RNG_SR_CEIS),
> -		      "bad RNG status - %x\n", sr))
> -		writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + RNG_SR);
> -
>  	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy((struct device *) priv->rng.priv);
>  	pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend((struct device *) priv->rng.priv);
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ