[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1464320450-5175-1-git-send-email-lv.zheng@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:40:50 +0800
From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA / hardware: Fix address check in acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width()
The address check in acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width() should be byte size
based, not bit width based. This patch fixes this mistake.
Reported-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
index 0f18dbc..74a591b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwregs.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ acpi_hw_get_access_bit_width(struct acpi_generic_address *reg, u8 max_bit_width)
if (!reg->bit_offset && reg->bit_width &&
ACPI_IS_POWER_OF_TWO(reg->bit_width) &&
ACPI_IS_ALIGNED(reg->bit_width, 8) &&
- ACPI_IS_ALIGNED(address, reg->bit_width)) {
+ ACPI_IS_ALIGNED(address, reg->bit_width >> 3)) {
return (reg->bit_width);
} else {
if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
--
1.7.10
Powered by blists - more mailing lists