lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aaf25d8db1aca03ba251bfd02ca85502@agner.ch>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2016 22:54:16 -0700
From:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Meng Yi <meng.yi@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	airlied@...hat.com
Subject: Re: fsl-dcu not works on latest "drm-next"

On 2016-05-26 02:11, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Thursday 26 May 2016 08:23:42, Meng Yi wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> > You've not specifically described the problem here - what are the
>> > endiannesses of both the CPU and the device you're talking to?  What
>> > specifically is the endianess problem you are seeing, what are you seeing
>> > and what do you expect to see?
>>
>> The CPU is little endian and the device DCU is big endian, specified
>> big-endian in DTS,
>>
>> And here is my DTS and regmap_config,
>>
>> Specified "big-endian" in DTS,
>>
>>         dcu: dcu@...0000 {
>>             compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcu";
>>             reg = <0x0 0x2ce0000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>             interrupts = <GIC_SPI 172 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>             clocks = <&platform_clk 0>;
>>             clock-names = "dcu";
>>             big-endian;
>>             status = "disabled";
>>         };
>>
>> I can't tell the difference of "reg_format_endian" and " val_format_endian
>> ", so I had tried four conditions. And all failed.
>>
>> static const struct regmap_config fsl_dcu_regmap_config = {
>>     .reg_bits = 32,
>>     .reg_stride = 4,
>>     .val_bits = 32,
>>     .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> 
> This needs to be a flat cache. See
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-January/099121.html
> or https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/24/281
> max_register also needs an appropriate value.

FWIW, the latest patch which addresses this issue is Patch 5/6 of this
patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/19/617

Unfortunately, that patchset missed the 4.7 merge window. I still miss
an Ack for the first patch of this patchset. But should go into the next
release...

--
Stefan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ