[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1454076-faac-47d1-823f-416950c22e28@email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 20:42:40 +0200
From: Boris Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/dumpstack: If addr_limit is non-default, display it
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>Easier said than done. struct thread_info doesn't have addr_limit on
>sensible architectures (e.g. sparc), and I'd rather not stick a bunch
>of ifdefs in generic code.
It's not like it doesn't have an actual address limit though - I'm guessing it is something like the max userspace address on the arch... UINT_MAX or somesuch.
--
Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists