lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1464558832-2262-5-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 May 2016 23:53:42 +0200
From:	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	GregKH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] eeprom: at24: call read/write functions via function pointers

The first step in simplifying the read and write functions is to call
them via function pointers stored in at24_data. When we eventually
split the routines into smaller ones (depending on whether they use
smbus or i2c operations) we'll simply assign them to said pointers
instead of checking the flags at runtime every time we read/write.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 564a201..0621937 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ struct at24_data {
 	int use_smbus;
 	int use_smbus_write;
 
+	ssize_t (*read_func)(struct at24_data *, char *, unsigned int, size_t);
+	ssize_t (*write_func)(struct at24_data *,
+			      const char *, unsigned int, size_t);
+
 	/*
 	 * Lock protects against activities from other Linux tasks,
 	 * but not from changes by other I2C masters.
@@ -351,7 +355,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
 	while (count) {
 		int	status;
 
-		status = at24_eeprom_read(at24, buf, off, count);
+		status = at24->read_func(at24, buf, off, count);
 		if (status < 0) {
 			mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
 			return status;
@@ -383,7 +387,7 @@ static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
 	while (count) {
 		int status;
 
-		status = at24_eeprom_write(at24, buf, off, count);
+		status = at24->write_func(at24, buf, off, count);
 		if (status < 0) {
 			mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
 			return status;
@@ -518,6 +522,9 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	at24->chip = chip;
 	at24->num_addresses = num_addresses;
 
+	at24->read_func = at24_eeprom_read;
+	at24->write_func = at24_eeprom_write;
+
 	writable = !(chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
 	if (writable) {
 		if (!use_smbus || use_smbus_write) {
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ