[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVYd01kWvN5Gv_2RtPXFX2VP0nOx7Ys6=em35rk0HoOmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 11:21:38 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/54] MAINTAINERS: Add file patterns for rockchip device
tree bindings
Hi Heiko,
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016, 11:05:42 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
>> Submitters of device tree binding documentation may forget to CC
>> the subsystem maintainer if this is missing.
>
> The "N: rockchip" line at the bottom of the block catches this nicely
> already (also just verified with a get_maintainer.pl -f call), so I don't
> think this new more explicit line is really necessary?
Oh right, thanks! I (my bashery) only looked at direct references to
Documentation/devicetree/bindings. I complely missed the rare users of "N:".
Will drop this patch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists