linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1464542922-7139-2-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 May 2016 19:28:42 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: Fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation

Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined
preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef:

    lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
     #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
	   ^
    lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
     #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
	   ^
    lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef]
     #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
	   ^

Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2.

Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this.

Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
---
 lib/test_hash.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c
index fd7a677100ebe935..a06ac379ad429c6b 100644
--- a/lib/test_hash.c
+++ b/lib/test_hash.c
@@ -219,21 +219,27 @@ test_hash_init(void)
 	}
 
 	/* Issue notices about skipped tests. */
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
-	pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
+#if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
 	pr_info("__hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
 #endif
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
-	pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
+#else
+	pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32
+#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1
 	pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
 #endif
-#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
-	pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
-#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
+#else
+	pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64
+#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1
 	pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic.");
 #endif
+#else
+	pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
+#endif
 
 	pr_notice("%u tests passed.", tests);
 
-- 
1.9.1