linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: dev: switch from register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160530070547.GA18199@mwanda>
Date:	Mon, 30 May 2016 10:05:47 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Erico Nunes <erico.nunes@...acom.ind.br>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: dev: switch from register_chrdev to cdev
 API"

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 06:04:58PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > These kinds of use after frees don't always cause a runtime problem.  I
> > found it using static analysis, but I bet you could detect it if you
> > enabled kasan.  The other option is to enable PAGE_POISONING?
> 
> Thanks, PAGE_POISONING did trigger the issue. So, I now picked up your
> patch instead of the revert because I could verify the problem and the
> proper solution. Thanks again.
> 
> What I still wonder: Which analysis reported the problem to you? I
> always run sparse, smatch, cppcheck, and coccicheck on the patches when
> applying and no-one reported the issue.

It's a Smatch warning but you have to build the cross function db to
detect this.  It takes a while (a few hours) but the command is simple
enough.

	./smatch_scripts/build_kernel_data.sh

regards,
dan carpenter