[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160530093729.768a9fe3@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 09:37:29 +0200
From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@...gnu.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI
probing
On Mon, 23 May 2016 10:28:28 +0200
Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
> x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
> - start a VM
> - add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has started (for
> example starting the VM in paused state, or hotplug during FW or boot
> loader)
> - resume the VM execution
>
> The x86 kernel detects the PCI device, but the pseries one does not.
>
> This happens because the rtasd kernel worker is currently started under
> device_initcall, while PCI probing happens earlier under subsys_initcall.
>
> As a consequence, if we have a pending RTAS event at boot time, a message
> is printed and the event is dropped.
>
> This patch moves all the initialization of rtasd to arch_initcall, which is
> run before subsys_call: this way, logging_enabled is true when the RTAS
> event pops up and it is not lost anymore.
>
> The proc fs bits stay at device_initcall because they cannot be run before
> fs_initcall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
Ping ?
> arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> index e864b7c5884e..ad9e4e1a2d5d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> @@ -526,10 +526,8 @@ void rtas_cancel_event_scan(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtas_cancel_event_scan);
>
> -static int __init rtas_init(void)
> +static int __init rtas_event_scan_init(void)
> {
> - struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> -
> if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -562,13 +560,24 @@ static int __init rtas_init(void)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + start_event_scan();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(rtas_event_scan_init);
> +
> +static int __init rtas_init(void)
> +{
> + struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> +
> + if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
> + return 0;
> +
> entry = proc_create("powerpc/rtas/error_log", S_IRUSR, NULL,
> &proc_rtas_log_operations);
> if (!entry)
> printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create error_log proc entry\n");
>
> - start_event_scan();
> -
> return 0;
> }
> __initcall(rtas_init);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists