[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5333252.Un7tdhWc5Q@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:16:43 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@...inx.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Axi-usb: Add support for 64-bit addressing.
On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:46:21 AM CEST Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> >
> The Axi-usb 5.00 IP is a FPGA based one. This IP needs to support two H/w designs one with 32 bit DMA addressing another one is 64 bit DMA addressing.
> And also in the software point for view we don’t have any register to figure out whether it is supporting 32 bit DMA addressing or 64 bit DMA addressing.
> To support both the designs I kept addrwidth property in the dt. I think here addrwidth property is make sense to differentiate the h/w configurations.
> If you want me to changes it to boolean please let me know I will fix it in the next version.
I think boolean would be more logical here, since what is configurable
here is not how many bits are supported, but whether the XUSB_DMA_DSAR_ADDR
register is present or not.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists