[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160530081837.GA8980@yexl-desktop>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 16:18:37 +0800
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrey Konovalov <adech.fo@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Konstantin Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Chernenkov <dmitryc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [lkp] [mm] 55834c5909: boot-slabinfo.num_objs +31.9% increasement
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:53:25AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:17 AM, kernel test robot
><xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> FYI, we noticed boot-slabinfo.num_objs +31.9% increasement due to commit:
>>
>> commit 55834c59098d0c5a97b0f3247e55832b67facdcf ("mm: kasan: initial memory quarantine implementation")
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>
>> in testcase: boot
>> on test machine: vm-lkp-wsx03-2G: 2 threads qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu host with 2G memory
>> with following parameters: sleep=1
>>
>>
>> Details are as below:
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
>>
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> compiler/kconfig/rootfs/sleep/tbox_group/testcase:
>> gcc-6/x86_64-randconfig-s4-05280557/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/1/vm-lkp-wsx03-2G/boot
>>
>> commit:
>> b8f1a75d61d8405a753380c6fb17ba84a5603cd4
>> 55834c59098d0c5a97b0f3247e55832b67facdcf
>>
>> b8f1a75d61d8405a 55834c59098d0c5a97b0f3247e
>> ---------------- --------------------------
>> %stddev %change %stddev
>> \ | \
>> 165450 ± 0% +31.9% 218176 ± 1% boot-slabinfo.num_objs
>> 19095 ± 5% +104.3% 39013 ± 3% boot-slabinfo.num_pages
>> 107.27 ± 2% +14.1% 122.43 ± 13% boot-time.boot
>> 97.13 ± 1% +4.3% 101.31 ± 1% boot-time.idle
>> 1105076 ± 0% -7.2% 1025056 ± 0% boot-meminfo.MemFree
>> 36269 ± 12% +215.7% 114517 ± 5% boot-meminfo.SUnreclaim
>> 76469 ± 5% +104.5% 156343 ± 4% boot-meminfo.Slab
>>
>>
>>
>> boot-slabinfo.num_objs
>>
>> 230000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | O O |
>> 220000 ++O O O OO OO O O OO OO |
>> OO O OOOO O OOOOOOO O O OO O |
>> 210000 ++ |
>> | |
>> 200000 ++ |
>> | |
>> 190000 ++ |
>> | |
>> 180000 ++ |
>> | |
>> 170000 ++ |
>> ********************************************************************
>> 160000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> boot-slabinfo.num_pages
>>
>> 45000 ++-------------O----------------------------------------------------+
>> | O O OO O O O O OOO |
>> 40000 +O OOO OO OO O O |
>> O OO O O O O O OO O O |
>> | O O O |
>> 35000 ++ |
>> | |
>> 30000 ++ |
>> | |
>> 25000 ++ |
>> | |
>> | * * *
>> 20000 +* * * ** * * * * * * ** **** ** * * * * * * :: * *** *|
>> * * ** ** * * ** *** * ** *** * * * * * ** *** * ** ** ** * * |
>> 15000 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> [*] bisect-good sample
>> [O] bisect-bad sample
>
>
>Hi Xiaolong,
>
>It is with CONFIG_KASAN=y? If yes, then increased memory usage is expected.
Hi, Dmitry
Yes, CONFIG_KASAN=y is set in config, see attached config file used for test.
# CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KASAN=y
CONFIG_KASAN=y
CONFIG_KASAN_OUTLINE=y
# CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE is not set
Thanks,
Xiaolong
View attachment "x86_64-randconfig-s4-05280557" of type "text/plain" (110986 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists