[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160530085244.GB25607@krava>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 10:52:44 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
tumanova@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
penberg@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/11] perf tools: Separate local/remote libunwind
config
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:
SNIP
> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> index 6f9f566..3a304a3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> @@ -354,10 +354,24 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),powerpc)
> endif
>
> ifndef NO_LIBUNWIND
> + have_libunwind :=
> ifneq ($(feature-libunwind), 1)
> msg := $(warning No libunwind found. Please install libunwind-dev[el] >= 1.1 and/or set LIBUNWIND_DIR);
> + NO_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND := 1
> + else
> + have_libunwind := 1
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBUNWIND_LOCAL_SUPPORT
> + $(call detected,CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND)
> + endif
> +
> + ifneq ($(have_libunwind), 1)
> NO_LIBUNWIND := 1
> + else
> + CFLAGS += -I$(LIBUNWIND_DIR)/include
> + LDFLAGS += -L$(LIBUNWIND_DIR)/lib
changelog says it's just switch, then why do we need to add above setup?
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists