linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160530085309.GE25607@krava>
Date:	Mon, 30 May 2016 10:53:09 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
	jpoimboe@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	tumanova@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
	penberg@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:59:59AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:

SNIP

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
> index b391e3e..849fec1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <sys/mman.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> +#ifndef REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND
>  #include <libunwind.h>
> +#endif
>  #include "callchain.h"
>  #include "thread.h"
>  #include "session.h"
> @@ -671,7 +673,9 @@ _unwind_libunwind_ops = {
>  	.get_entries    = _unwind__get_entries,
>  };
>  
> +#ifndef REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND
>  void register_local_unwind_libunwind_ops(struct thread *thread)
>  {
>  	thread->unwind_libunwind_ops = &_unwind_libunwind_ops;
>  }
> +#endif

above hunks should go to separate patch

however I still think it'd be more clear if we separate the code like:

code template		- util/unwind-libunwind.c
arch template		- arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind.c

wrapper for local	- util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
wrapper for x86_32	- arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind-x86_32.c
wrapper for arm64	- arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind-arm64.c

jirka