linux-kernel - Re: pxa_defconfig runtime failures due to 'ARM: pxa: activate pinctrl for device-tree machines'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 08:27:15 +0200
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: pxa_defconfig runtime failures due to 'ARM: pxa: activate pinctrl for device-tree machines'

Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:

> On 05/28/2016 01:24 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>> I'd rather say that pxa_defconfig doesn't work anymore on any legacy system.
>> Its first purpose was to ensure compilation coverage of all legacy pxa systems.
>> Its second one was to have a single kernel bootable on all legacy pxa systems.
>>
>> Therefore, would you tell me if the patch in [1] fixes your issue ?
>>
>
> Yes, it does. It is actually the workaround I deployed for my test builds,
> since I thought that the change was on purpose.

Good. Can I take that as a Tested-by ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert