[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160531090251.GJ3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:02:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: schedutil: map raw required frequency to
driver frequency
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:02:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> But this is something that is fundamentally broken for now. The user writes
> updates the policy->max/min, we return the call to the user thinks that it has
IMO the presence of these user min/max files is the broken part.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists