[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160531092146.GT3192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:21:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched: Clean up SD_BALANCE_WAKE flags in sched
domain build-up
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:11:37AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> The SD_BALANCE_WAKE is irrelevant in the contexts of these two removals,
> and in addition SD_BALANCE_WAKE is not and should not be set in any
> sched_domain flags so far.
This Changelog doesn't make any sense...
> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7f2cae4..e00b8ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6229,10 +6229,10 @@ static void set_domain_attribute(struct sched_domain *sd,
> request = attr->relax_domain_level;
> if (request < sd->level) {
> /* turn off idle balance on this domain */
> - sd->flags &= ~(SD_BALANCE_WAKE|SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> + sd->flags &= ~(SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> } else {
> /* turn on idle balance on this domain */
> - sd->flags |= (SD_BALANCE_WAKE|SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> + sd->flags |= (SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists