linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87twhea59z.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 13:30:32 +0300
From:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To:	Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Dan Allen <dan@...ndevise.io>,
	Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

On Tue, 31 May 2016, Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de> wrote:
> Am 31.05.2016 um 10:07 schrieb Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>:
>> 0-day builds all docs, and checks for new warnings. Even in today's
>> gpu.tmpl build there's a massive pile of warnings, so yes developers
>> don't look. But 0-day does, and then developers look at the nice mails
>> from 0-day. It mostly works to keep out new fail I think.
>
> In general, I'am not very happy with workarounds like this. IMO these
> are workarounds are often, rewards bunglers and punish those with more work,
> who want make thinks right. There might be situations where 0-day build
> is the only/best solution. But *here* we are talking about one additional
> comment line the author adds, when he modify his source comments from kernel-doc 
> to reST markup .. IMO not very hard.

That "one line" translates to nearly 50000 kernel-doc comments in more
than 6000 files. If you expect people to add a tag in each file/comment,
it will never happen. If we assume it's all rst, we can at least start
converting.

I quickly wrote a small "kernel-doc-rst-lint" script (70 lines of
python) based on rst-lint [1] that runs kernel-doc on a file and reports
all the kernel-doc and rst-lint errors in the output. This can be run as
a "checker" in the kernel build with

$ make CHECKER=scripts/kernel-doc-rst-lint C=1

and it can provide better and more direct warnings on kernel-doc/rst
errors than a full Sphinx build does.

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/restructuredtext_lint



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center