[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574D9B7D.3020101@metafoo.de>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:11:09 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/7] iio: Add current_trigger_id alternative
On 05/23/2016 08:39 PM, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> This allows controlling the current trigger by numeric ID rather than
> name.
This is most certainly the far better interface, but so far we've tried to
have only one way to do a certain task with the IIO userspace ABI and try to
live with our mistakes of the past.
And while this is the better interface I don't think it is that much better
that it justifies the ambiguity that is introduced by it.
Adding a new interface makes only sense in my opinion if there is a
significant improvement in either usability or performance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists