linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Documentation: Add documentation for APM X-Gene SoC PMU DTS binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 10:18:18 -0700
From:	Tai Tri Nguyen <ttnguyen@....com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches <patches@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Documentation: Add documentation for APM X-Gene
 SoC PMU DTS binding

Hi Will,

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:12:19PM -0700, Tai Tri Nguyen wrote:
>> It's been weeks.
>> I just want to ping again if you have any more comments on this patch set?
>
> We seem to have reached a stalemate whereby:
>
>   - The devicetree maintainers don't agree with your binding
>   - You don't agree with them
>   - I won't merge the patch without their ack
>
> so I guess you either need to try harder to convince them about the
> index-based binding, or bite the bullet and fix it to make them happy.
>
> Will

Thanks. Yes, I will fix it.

Regards,
-- 
Tai