linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] Add the latent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJruX++kxqyvB0avFafbe07R3J3mCorqZD8Fs2n1uztsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 10:25:00 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Hector Martin marcan <marcan@...can.st>
Cc:	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Hector Martin "marcan"
<marcan@...can.st> wrote:
> Then there is the other side: is there are reason not to just make the
> plugin v2v3? That would certainly remove all doubt and potential issues,
> and complies with both GCC's license and the kernel's.

If that works, please take it up with the plugin authors. You and I
aren't going to convince each other, and I'm satisfied with the
licensing as it already is.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security