[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160531120708.b887c44f1f7d9bb536ad2c45@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 12:07:08 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] zram: switch to crypto api
On Tue, 31 May 2016 21:29:18 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> forgot to attach some benchmarks:
>
> (x86_64, 4GB, zram-perf script)
>
> perf reported run-time fio (max jobs=3)
>
> test-fio-zram-842
> 197.907655282 seconds time elapsed
> 201.623142884 seconds time elapsed
> 226.854291345 seconds time elapsed
> test-fio-zram-DEFLATE
> 253.259516155 seconds time elapsed
> 258.148563401 seconds time elapsed
> 290.251909365 seconds time elapsed
> test-fio-zram-LZ4
> 27.022598717 seconds time elapsed
> 29.580522717 seconds time elapsed
> 33.293463430 seconds time elapsed
> test-fio-zram-LZ4HC
> 56.393954615 seconds time elapsed
> 74.904659747 seconds time elapsed
> 101.940998564 seconds time elapsed
> test-fio-zram-LZO
> 28.155948075 seconds time elapsed
> 30.390036330 seconds time elapsed
> 34.455773159 seconds time elapsed
I'm having trouble understanding the benchmark results. What is being
compared to what and which was faster and how much?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists