linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk/vt8500: Fix compilation warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30846983.uaNfNPJlta@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 22:15:38 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru>
Cc:	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>,
	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk/vt8500: Fix compilation warnings

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 9:38:54 PM CEST Roman Volkov wrote:
> 
> Arnd, your version is fine for me. We may apply it instead.
> 
> As you can see, I attached another patch where the logic for WM8650 is
> completely reworked. This patch also removes the warning, that is why
> fixing the wm8650 function is not necessary.
> 
> What about the WM8650 enhancement? Can I apply it on top of your
> changes?

I think the easiest way is if you pick up my patch and submit it together
with your other patch as a series (keeping my From: line and adding your
Signed-off-by: below mine).

My patch should probably go first so we can get it into linux-4.7, while
I assume your other one is for 4.8? If we want both in 4.7, either order
is fine.

	Arnd