[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1464730604.14627.66.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 14:36:44 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bbjorn@...k.no,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/uuid.c: eliminate uuid_[bl]e_index arrays
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:31 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Here's a patch implementing the suggestion I made earlier. This reduces
> code size, data size, and run time for input and output of UUIDs.
[]
> diff --git a/lib/uuid.c b/lib/uuid.c
[]
> @@ -97,32 +97,28 @@ bool uuid_is_valid(const char *uuid)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(uuid_is_valid);
>
> -static int __uuid_to_bin(const char *uuid, __u8 b[16], const u8 ei[16])
> +static int __uuid_to_bin(const char uuid[36], __u8 b[16], const u8 si[16])
Functions with sized array arguments are generally undesired.
Linus once wrote: (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2031400)
array arguments in C don't
actually exist. Sadly, compilers accept it for various bad historical
reasons, and silently turn it into just a pointer argument. There are
arguments for them, but they are from weak minds.
Perhaps this would be better using simple pointers and without the __
static int __uuid_to_bin(const char *uuid, u8 *b, const u8 *si)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists