[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iKRnU6gBHcyjqVBwCJf_rJsb-PTiCsRRtSENeZKMcr+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 00:32:19 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in IO resource allocation
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>>> Can you please try the appended patch (untested)?
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply. Patch looks OK on my system... it boots
>> (which is very good :) and I see
>>
>> system 00:01: [io 0x0400-0x047f] has been reserved
>>
>> however I don't see the "ACPI CPU throttle" region reserved in
>> /proc/ioports... haven't debugged why acpi_processor_get_throttling()
>> isn't getting called or what is happening yet.
>>
>> Will dig a bit deeper and let you know.
>
> It may not be called at all if _PTC is used on that system, for example.
I mean acpi_processor_get_throttling_fadt(), of course. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists