[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601231943.GD30064@insomnia>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:19:43 +0800
From:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	manfred@...orfullife.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, will.deacon@....com,
	Waiman.Long@....com, tj@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net, oleg@...hat.com,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, sasha.levin@...cle.com,
	hofrat@...dl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 3/8] locking: Introduce smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 06:22:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:52:14PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:41:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > @@ -292,7 +282,7 @@ static void sem_wait_array(struct sem_ar
> > >  		sem = sma->sem_base + i;
> > >  		spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
> > >  	}
> > > -	ipc_smp_acquire__after_spin_is_unlocked();
> > > +	smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
> > 
> > I wonder whether we can kill this barrier after updating
> > spin_unlock_wait() to ACQUIRE?
> 
> See patch 5 doing that :-)
Oops, right ;-)
Regards,
Boqun
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
