[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601084015.GF13738@krava>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:40:15 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, wangnan0@...wei.com,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
tumanova@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
penberg@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/14] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:19:11AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:
SNIP
> +
> + ifeq ($(feature-libunwind-x86), 1)
> + $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86)
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBUNWIND_X86_SUPPORT
> + LDFLAGS += -lunwind-x86
> + have_libunwind = 1
> + endif
> +
> ifneq ($(feature-libunwind), 1)
> msg := $(warning No libunwind found. Please install libunwind-dev[el] >= 1.1 and/or set LIBUNWIND_DIR);
> NO_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND := 1
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
> index 004fb1d..7746e09 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-aux.o
> libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND) += unwind-libdw.o
> libperf-$(CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND) += unwind-libunwind-local.o
> libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND) += unwind-libunwind.o
> +libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86) += libunwind/x86_32.o
seems odd but I dont have any better idea.. let's see what
others have to say ;-)
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists