linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3 7/8] locking: Move smp_cond_load_acquire() and friends into asm-generic/barrier.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:06:54 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, manfred@...orfullife.com,
	dave@...olabs.net, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	boqun.feng@...il.com, tj@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, davem@...emloft.net, oleg@...hat.com,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, sasha.levin@...cle.com,
	hofrat@...dl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 7/8] locking: Move smp_cond_load_acquire() and
 friends into asm-generic/barrier.h

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:00:10PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Will, since ARM64 seems to want to use this, does the below make sense
> > to you?
> 
> Not especially -- I was going to override smp_cond_load_acquire anyway
> because I want to build it using cmpwait_acquire and get rid of the
> smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep trick, which is likely slower on arm64.
> 
> So I'd be happier nuking cmpwait from the generic interfaces and using
> smp_cond_load_acquire everywhere, if that's possible.

Works for me; but that would loose using cmpwait() for
!smp_cond_load_acquire() spins, you fine with that?

The two conversions in the patch were both !acquire spins.