linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect sched_entity movement into task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160601125407.GA28447@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:54:07 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
	yuyang.du@...el.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com,
	Morten.Rasmussen@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect sched_entity movement into
 task_group's utilization

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Ensure that the changes of the utilization of a sched_entity will be
> reflected in the task_group hierarchy.
> 
> This patch tries another way than the flat utilization hierarchy proposal
> to ensure the changes will be propagated down to the root cfs.

Which would be:

 lkml.kernel.org/r/1460327765-18024-5-git-send-email-yuyang.du@...el.com

Right? Yuyang, there were some issues with the patches leading up to
that proposal, were you going to update the flat util thing without
those patches or can you find yourself in Vince's patches?

(just so I can get a picture of what all patches to look at when
reviewing)