[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601143250.GA27032@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:32:50 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@...sung.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-clock: remove unneeded posix_clock_compat_ioctl()
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:54:41PM +0900, Jungseung Lee wrote:
> posix_clock_compat_ioctl() is identical to posix_clock_ioctl().
> We don't need additional compat_ioctl in this time.
> Remove posix_clock_compat_ioctl() and let posix_clock_ioctl() is in charge.
Did you test this patch? Did you run a 32 program using the ioctl on
a 64 bit kernel?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists