lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574EFCFE.1000903@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:19:26 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] mm, vmscan: use proper classzone_idx in
 should_continue_reclaim()

On 06/01/2016 04:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-05-16 15:08:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [...]
>> @@ -2364,11 +2350,12 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
>>  }
>>  
>>  static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>> -			bool is_classzone)
>> +			int classzone_idx)
>>  {
>>  	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
>>  	bool reclaimable = false;
>> +	bool is_classzone = (classzone_idx == zone_idx(zone));
>>  
>>  	do {
>>  		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
>> @@ -2450,7 +2437,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>>  			reclaimable = true;
>>  
>>  	} while (should_continue_reclaim(zone, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
>> -					 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc));
>> +			 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc, classzone_idx));
>>  
>>  	return reclaimable;
>>  }
>> @@ -2580,7 +2567,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>>  			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
>> +		shrink_zone(zone, sc, classzone_idx);
> 
> this should be is_classzone, right?

No, this is shrink_zones() context, not shrink_zone().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ