lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:41:51 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	John Einar Reitan <john.reitan@...s.arm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
	Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@....com>,
	Sangseok Lee <sangseok.lee@....com>,
	Kyeongdon Kim <kyeongdon.kim@....com>,
	Chulmin Kim <cmlaika.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration

On Wed,  1 Jun 2016 08:21:09 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:

> Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded
> system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and easy fork fail.
> 
> The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver mainly.
> With memory pressure, their pages were spread out all of pageblock and
> it cannot be migrated with current compaction algorithm which supports
> only LRU pages. In the end, compaction cannot work well so reclaimer
> shrinks all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to
> fail to fork easily which requires order-[2 or 3] allocations.
> 
> Other pain point is that they cannot use CMA memory space so when OOM
> kill happens, I can see many free pages in CMA area, which is not
> memory efficient. In our product which has big CMA memory, it reclaims
> zones too exccessively to allocate GPU and zram page although there are
> lots of free space in CMA so system becomes very slow easily.

But this isn't presently implemented for GPU drivers or for CMA, yes?

What's the story there?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ