| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <VI1PR0401MB1709E215DCE264B2C27B3DAB92580@VI1PR0401MB1709.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 05:01:19 +0000
From: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.lian@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] aer: add support aer interrupt with none
MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode
Hi Bjorn,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:48 AM
> To: Po Liu
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann;
> Roy Zang; Marc Zyngier; Stuart Yoder; Yang-Leo Li; Minghuan Lian; Bjorn
> Helgaas; Shawn Guo; Mingkai Hu; Rob Herring
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] aer: add support aer interrupt with none
> MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode
>
> [+cc Rob]
>
> Hi Po,
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 02:00:06PM +0800, Po Liu wrote:
> > On some platforms, root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode.
> > When chip support the aer interrupt with none MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode,
> > maybe there is interrupt line for aer pme etc. Search the interrupt
> > number in the fdt file.
>
> My understanding is that AER interrupt signaling can be done via INTx,
> MSI, or MSI-X (PCIe spec r3.0, sec 6.2.4.1.2). Apparently your device
> doesn't support MSI or MSI-X. Are you saying it doesn't support INTx
> either? How is the interrupt you're requesting here different from INTx?
Layerscape use none of MSI or MSI-X or INTx to indicate the devices or root error
in RC mode. But use an independent SPI interrupt(arm interrupt controller) line.
And at same time, AER capability list in PCIe register descriptors. And also,
The Root Error Command/status register was proper to enable/disable the AER interrupt.
This hardware implementation make sense in some platforms, and this was described
in the function init_service_irqs() in the drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c in current
kernel as:
241 * We're not going to use MSI-X, so try MSI and fall back to INTx.
242 * If neither MSI/MSI-X nor INTx available, try other interrupt. On
243 * some platforms, root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode
244 */
So I think this was the proper place to update the irq number before aer service
driver was loaded.
>
> My guess is that your device *does* support INTx, and we should use that.
> ACPI has the generic _PRT that describes INTx routing. There must be
> something similar for DT, but I don't know what it is. It seems like
> this should be described using that DT mechanism (whatever it is), and
> we shouldn't need special-case code in the portdrv code.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> > b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c index 32d4d0a..64833e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/pcieport_if.h>
> > #include <linux/aer.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >
> > #include "../pci.h"
> > #include "portdrv.h"
> > @@ -199,6 +200,28 @@ static int pcie_port_enable_msix(struct pci_dev
> > *dev, int *vectors, int mask) static int init_service_irqs(struct
> > pci_dev *dev, int *irqs, int mask) {
> > int i, irq = -1;
> > + int ret;
> > + struct device_node *np = NULL;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES; i++)
> > + irqs[i] = 0;
> > +
> > + if (dev->bus->dev.of_node)
> > + np = dev->bus->dev.of_node;
> > +
> > + /* If root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode,
> > + * request irq for aer
> > + */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && np &&
> > + (mask & PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME)) {
> > + ret = of_irq_get_byname(np, "aer");
> > + if (ret > 0) {
> > + irqs[PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER_SHIFT] = ret;
> > + if (dev->irq)
> > + irq = dev->irq;
> > + goto no_msi;
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * If MSI cannot be used for PCIe PME or hotplug, we have to use
> @@
> > -224,11 +247,13 @@ static int init_service_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev,
> int *irqs, int mask)
> > irq = dev->irq;
> >
> > no_msi:
> > - for (i = 0; i < PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES; i++)
> > - irqs[i] = irq;
> > + for (i = 0; i < PCIE_PORT_DEVICE_MAXSERVICES; i++) {
> > + if (!irqs[i])
> > + irqs[i] = irq;
> > + }
> > irqs[PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_VC_SHIFT] = -1;
> >
> > - if (irq < 0)
> > + if (irq < 0 && irqs[PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER_SHIFT] < 0)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.1.0.27.g96db324
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists