[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bn3kcc7o.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:54:35 +0900
From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code
On Fri, 27 May 2016 01:53:34 +0900,
Rich Felker wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > [[PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code] On 22/04/2016 (Fri 14:07) Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
> > > For anyone new to the underlying goal of this cleanup, we are trying to
> > > make kernel code consistent with the Makefiles/Kconfigs that control them.
> >
> > Ping -- wondering if there are any issues here, or if I can expect these
> > to be merged upstream in the merge window. I didn't see them loop
> > around via the linux-next tree but I wasn't sure if arch/sh has a repo
> > for linux-next.
>
> I don't have experience with the affected code, but it looks ok unless
> any of these "should" be modular and Kconfig was just wrong to
> disallow it.
>
> Sato-san, do you have an opinion on these? Should I go ahead and just
> merge them?
It looks no problem.
I think can merge it.
> Rich
>
> > > This means not using modular functions/macros for code that can never
> > > be built as a module. Some of the other downfalls this leads to are:
> > >
> > > (1) it is easy to accidentally write unused module_exit and remove code
> > > (2) it can be misleading when reading the source, thinking it can be
> > > modular when the Makefile and/or Kconfig prohibit it
> > > (3) it requires the include of the module.h header file which in turn
> > > includes nearly everything else, thus adding to CPP overhead.
> > > (4) it gets copied/replicated into other drivers and spreads like weeds.
> > >
> > > Three of the four commits here are completely trivial with zero runtime
> > > impact whatsoever. The fourth has a deletion of a ".remove" function
> > > and as we've done elsewhere, we block the sysfs ability to reach in and
> > > manually execute that function, since there isn't a sane use case for
> > > which doing that makes sense.
> > >
> > > Build tested on today's linux-next ; full build fails on duplicate syms
> > > from OF generic board, but that is a known and reported issue elsewhere;
> > > it has nothing to do with the changes here.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > > --
> > >
> > > Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> > > Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > > Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Gortmaker (4):
> > > sh: make time.c explicitly non-modular
> > > sh: make mm/asids-debugfs explicitly non-modular
> > > sh: make board-secureedge5410 explicitly non-modular
> > > sh: make heartbeat driver explicitly non-modular
> > >
> > > arch/sh/boards/board-secureedge5410.c | 3 +--
> > > arch/sh/drivers/heartbeat.c | 32 +++-----------------------------
> > > arch/sh/kernel/time.c | 3 +--
> > > arch/sh/mm/asids-debugfs.c | 5 +----
> > > 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.8.0
> > >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists