lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1464828278.3161.12.camel@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jun 2016 02:44:38 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, lkp@...org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput
 -32.9% regression

On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 08:28 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:

> If this report annoyed you, I am sorry about that.  We just want to be
> helpful via providing some information.  Now I know hackbench is
> sensitive to load_avg changes, thanks a lot for the information.

No no, I meant the other way around ;-)  If you're one of the folks
_doing_ performance monitoring, it can be a tad annoying to finding
that the effort you invested was all for naught.

	-Mike

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ