[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4399273.0kije2Qdx5@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:44:51 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
waiman.long@...com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/qrwlock: fix write unlock issue in big endian
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline void queued_read_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> */
> static inline void queued_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> {
> - smp_store_release((u8 *)&lock->cnts, 0);
> + (void)atomic_sub_return_release(_QW_LOCKED, &lock->cnts);
> }
Isn't this more expensive than the existing version?
Arnd
Download attachment "org.kde.konsole.desktop" of type "application/x-desktop" (6368 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists