linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:08:09 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
	mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default
 spinlock implemention

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:47:47PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016年06月02日 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> >
> >I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough...
> >
> sorry for noise.
> In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is changed by accident.
> So I resend them just for sure.
> sorry again...

Just don't use corporate email if its not reliable or pain to use; do
not send multiple copies just because.