[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160602110809.GA3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:08:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default
spinlock implemention
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:47:47PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年06月02日 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> >
> >I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough...
> >
> sorry for noise.
> In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is changed by accident.
> So I resend them just for sure.
> sorry again...
Just don't use corporate email if its not reliable or pain to use; do
not send multiple copies just because.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists