| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1464867930-28588-2-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 17:15:29 +0530
From: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@...el.com>
To: Intel-gfx-trybot@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Disable preemption around use of this_cpu_ptr()
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Between acquiring the this_cpu_ptr() and using it, ideally we don't want
to be preempted and work on another CPU's private data. this_cpu_ptr()
checks whether or not preemption is disable, and get_cpu_ptr() provides
a convenient wrapper for operating on the cpu ptr inside a preemption
disabled critical section (which currently is provided by the
spinlock). Indeed if we disable preemption around this_cpu_ptr,
we do not need the CPU local spinlock - so long as take care that no other
CPU is running that code as do perform the cross-CPU cache flushing and
teardown, but that is a subject for another patch.
[ 167.997877] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: usb-storage/216
[ 167.997940] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
[ 167.997945] CPU: 7 PID: 216 Comm: usb-storage Tainted: G U 4.7.0-rc1-gfxbench-RO_Patchwork_1057+ #1
[ 167.997948] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Pro 3500 Series/2ABF, BIOS 8.11 10/24/2012
[ 167.997951] 0000000000000000 ffff880118b7f9c8 ffffffff8140dca5 0000000000000007
[ 167.997958] ffffffff81a3a7e9 ffff880118b7f9f8 ffffffff8142a927 0000000000000000
[ 167.997965] ffff8800d499ed58 0000000000000001 00000000000fffff ffff880118b7fa08
[ 167.997971] Call Trace:
[ 167.997977] [<ffffffff8140dca5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92
[ 167.997981] [<ffffffff8142a927>] check_preemption_disabled+0xd7/0xe0
[ 167.997985] [<ffffffff8142a947>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
[ 167.997990] [<ffffffff81507e17>] alloc_iova_fast+0xb7/0x210
[ 167.997994] [<ffffffff8150c55f>] intel_alloc_iova+0x7f/0xd0
[ 167.997998] [<ffffffff8151021d>] intel_map_sg+0xbd/0x240
[ 167.998002] [<ffffffff810e5efd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
[ 167.998009] [<ffffffff81596059>] usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma+0x4b9/0x5a0
[ 167.998013] [<ffffffff81596d19>] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0xe9/0xaa0
[ 167.998017] [<ffffffff810cff2f>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6f/0xa0
[ 167.998022] [<ffffffff810d525c>] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x1c/0x50
[ 167.998025] [<ffffffff810e5efd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
[ 167.998028] [<ffffffff815988f3>] usb_submit_urb+0x3f3/0x5a0
[ 167.998032] [<ffffffff810d0082>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x122/0x1b0
[ 167.998035] [<ffffffff81599ae7>] usb_sg_wait+0x67/0x150
[ 167.998039] [<ffffffff815dc202>] usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist.part.3+0x82/0xd0
[ 167.998042] [<ffffffff815dc29c>] usb_stor_bulk_srb+0x4c/0x60
[ 167.998045] [<ffffffff815dc42e>] usb_stor_Bulk_transport+0x17e/0x420
[ 167.998049] [<ffffffff815dcf32>] usb_stor_invoke_transport+0x242/0x540
[ 167.998052] [<ffffffff810e5efd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
[ 167.998058] [<ffffffff815dba19>] usb_stor_transparent_scsi_command+0x9/0x10
[ 167.998061] [<ffffffff815de518>] usb_stor_control_thread+0x158/0x260
[ 167.998064] [<ffffffff815de3c0>] ? fill_inquiry_response+0x20/0x20
[ 167.998067] [<ffffffff815de3c0>] ? fill_inquiry_response+0x20/0x20
[ 167.998071] [<ffffffff8109ddfa>] kthread+0xea/0x100
[ 167.998078] [<ffffffff817ac6af>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
[ 167.998081] [<ffffffff8109dd10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1f0/0x1f0
v2: convert preempt_disable(); var = this_cpu_ptr() to var = get_cpu_ptr()
v3: Actually use get_cpu_ptr (not get_cpu_var). Drop the spinlock
removal, concentrate on the immediate bug fix.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96293
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iova.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
index ba764a0..e23001b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
@@ -420,8 +420,10 @@ retry:
/* Try replenishing IOVAs by flushing rcache. */
flushed_rcache = true;
+ preempt_disable();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
free_cpu_cached_iovas(cpu, iovad);
+ preempt_enable();
goto retry;
}
@@ -749,7 +751,7 @@ static bool __iova_rcache_insert(struct iova_domain *iovad,
bool can_insert = false;
unsigned long flags;
- cpu_rcache = this_cpu_ptr(rcache->cpu_rcaches);
+ cpu_rcache = get_cpu_ptr(rcache->cpu_rcaches);
spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_rcache->lock, flags);
if (!iova_magazine_full(cpu_rcache->loaded)) {
@@ -779,6 +781,7 @@ static bool __iova_rcache_insert(struct iova_domain *iovad,
iova_magazine_push(cpu_rcache->loaded, iova_pfn);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_rcache->lock, flags);
+ put_cpu_ptr(rcache->cpu_rcaches);
if (mag_to_free) {
iova_magazine_free_pfns(mag_to_free, iovad);
@@ -812,7 +815,7 @@ static unsigned long __iova_rcache_get(struct iova_rcache *rcache,
bool has_pfn = false;
unsigned long flags;
- cpu_rcache = this_cpu_ptr(rcache->cpu_rcaches);
+ cpu_rcache = get_cpu_ptr(rcache->cpu_rcaches);
spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_rcache->lock, flags);
if (!iova_magazine_empty(cpu_rcache->loaded)) {
@@ -834,6 +837,7 @@ static unsigned long __iova_rcache_get(struct iova_rcache *rcache,
iova_pfn = iova_magazine_pop(cpu_rcache->loaded, limit_pfn);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_rcache->lock, flags);
+ put_cpu_ptr(rcache->cpu_rcaches);
return iova_pfn;
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists