[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <057fb9e8-002a-0aac-a36d-ef074ab2111e@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:27:28 -0400
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add watchdog amd Security SubSystem
to Exynos5410
Hello Krzysztof,
On 06/02/2016 02:18 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 05:16 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> +&watchdog {
>>> + clocks = <&clock CLK_WDT>;
>>> + clock-names = "watchdog";
>>> + samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_system_controller>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> Since you used the same ID than Exynos5420 for the SSS and WDT clocks,
>> I wonder if the clock and clock-names shouldn't be just defined in the
>> shared exynos54xx.dtsi as is the case for the interrupts that are also
>> the same?
>>
>> The patch looks good to me though, so whatever you decide:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>
> Thanks for review and comments.
>
> The 'clock' property cannot be moved - there is no clock phandle and the
> clock IDs are not included in 54xx.
>
You are right, I missed that. Thanks a lot for the clarification.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists